Perspectives of Management
Table of Content
- Introduction to Perspectives of Management
- The Empirical or Classical Perspective
- Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor)
- Administrative Theory (Henry Fayol)
- Bureaucracy (Max Weber)
- Other Classical Contributors
- The Human Relations or Behavioral Approach
- The Hawthorne Studies
- The Systems Approach
- Decision Theory and Mathematical Approaches
- The Contingency Approach
- Theory X, Theory Y, and Theory Z
- Contemporary Management Perspectives
- Examples and Practical Applications
- Quick Revision Summary
Introduction to Perspectives of Management
Welcome to the detailed study notes on the Perspectives of Management. To understand how modern organizations are run, we must look at how management thought has evolved over time. Throughout history, different experts and scholars have proposed various philosophies and approaches that they believed were the best ways to manage an organization. These different viewpoints are often categorized into specific "schools of thought" or perspectives.
The Empirical or Classical Perspective
The empirical or classical approach was developed in the early 20th century. Thinkers in this school believed that the best way to understand management was to study the experiences of successful managers. However, critics point out that business situations change constantly, and management cannot just rely on past precedents.
The classical approach is divided into three main branches: Scientific Management, Administrative Theory, and Bureaucracy.
Scientific Management (F.W. Taylor)
Frederick Winslow Taylor is known as the Father of Scientific Management. Working during the Industrial Revolution, he wanted to find a scientific way to improve efficiency on the factory shop floor.
Taylor noticed a major problem: workers were purposely working much slower than their actual capacity. He called this phenomenon Soldering. He identified four reasons for soldering:
- Fear of job loss: Workers believed that if they worked faster, fewer workers would be needed.
- Poor wage systems: Non-incentive wages meant everyone got paid the same, regardless of how much they produced.
- Lack of motivation: Without financial incentives for extra effort, workers stuck to slow, comfortable paces.
- Rule of thumb methods: Workers relied on personal habits rather than scientifically proven, efficient methods.
To solve this, Taylor introduced the Four Principles of Scientific Management:
- Develop a Science for Work: Replace old "rule of thumb" guesswork with scientifically studied and optimized work methods.
- Scientific Selection and Training: Instead of letting workers train themselves, management should carefully select, train, and develop each worker.
- Cooperation: Management and workers must wholeheartedly cooperate to ensure the work follows scientific principles.
- Equal Division of Work: Work and responsibility should be divided equally between management (who plan and design the work) and workers (who execute the tasks).
Taylor's Famous Experiments:
- Time and Motion Study: Using a stopwatch, Taylor timed workers to find the "one best way" to do a job.
- Pig Iron Experiment: By optimizing work and rest periods, Taylor dramatically increased the amount of iron a worker could move in a day without getting exhausted.
- The Science of Shoveling: He determined that the perfect shovel load was 21 pounds and designed different shovels for different materials, multiplying productivity.
- Brick Laying (by the Gilbreths): Inspired by Taylor, the Gilbreths used motion pictures to reduce the number of hand motions needed to lay bricks.
Table 1: Pros and Cons of Scientific Management
| Advantages (Contributions) | Criticisms |
|---|---|
| Maximized human and material resources, eliminating waste. | Ignored worker creativity by forcing "one best way". |
| Introduced incentive-based wages tied directly to productivity. | Reduced human workers to mere "cogs in a machine". |
| Promoted a "mental revolution" of mutual trust between workers and managers. | Fragmented jobs, making work highly repetitive and boring. |
Administrative Theory (Henry Fayol)
While Taylor focused on factory workers, a French industrialist named Henry Fayol focused on the overall administration of the organization. He believed that management is a universal activity that happens everywhere in business, government, and even at home. Fayol identified five main functions of a manager: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.
Table 2: Fayol's 14 Principles of Management
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| 1. Division of Work | Work should be divided into small tasks so workers can specialize, increasing accuracy and output. |
| 2. Authority & Responsibility | Managers must have the right to give orders (authority), but they must also take accountability (responsibility). |
| 3. Discipline | Employees must respect rules and employment contracts. It requires good leadership and self-control. |
| 4. Unity of Command | An employee should receive orders from only one superior to avoid confusion and protect discipline. |
| 5. Unity of Direction | Activities with the same goal must be directed by one manager using one unified plan. |
| 6. Subordination of Individual Interest | The goals of the organization must always come before the personal interests of any single individual. |
| 7. Remuneration | Wages should be fair and satisfactory to both the employer and the employee. |
| 8. Centralization | There must be a proper balance between concentrating power at the top (centralization) and distributing it to subordinates. |
| 9. Scalar Chain | The formal line of authority from top to bottom. |
| 10. Order | Everything and everyone should be in the right place at the right time. |
| 11. Equity | Managers should treat employees with kindness and justice to earn their loyalty and devotion. |
| 12. Stability of Tenure | Employees need job security. High turnover is inefficient and harmful. |
| 13. Initiative | Employees should be encouraged to think up and execute new ideas. |
| 14. Esprit de Corps | "Union is strength." Promoting team spirit and harmony builds a stronger organization. |
Bureaucracy (Max Weber)
The German sociologist Max Weber looked at management structurally and proposed an "ideal" type of organization called a Bureaucracy.
- Job Specialization
- Hierarchy
- Formal Selection
- Formal Rules and Regulations
- Impersonality
- Career Orientation
Other Classical Contributors
Mary Parker Follet: Argued that managers and workers should function as a cohesive group.
Chester Bernard: Wrote The Functions of the Executive.
The Human Relations or Behavioral Approach
The classical theories treated humans as purely economic beings motivated only by money.
The Hawthorne Studies
Elton Mayo and his team conducted a famous series of experiments at the Western Electrical Company's Hawthorne plant near Chicago.
The Systems Approach
This approach views an organization as a social system.
Decision Theory and Mathematical Approaches
Decision Theory Approach: Emerged after World War II.
Mathematical/Quantitative Approach: Treats management as a logical process solved using mathematical formulas.
The Contingency Approach
The Contingency Approach states that "there is no one best way to manage".
Theory X, Theory Y, and Theory Z
Douglas McGregor introduced Theory X and Theory Y.
Theory Z (William Ouchi): Hybrid management style combining American and Japanese management practices.
Contemporary Management Perspectives
Peter Drucker, Edwards Deming, Joseph Juran, Thomas Peters, Robert Waterman, C.K. Prahalad, Gary Hamel, and Peter Senge contributed modern management ideas.
Examples and Practical Applications
Henry Ford used scientific management principles in automobile assembly lines.
A hospital demonstrates the Systems Approach where different departments work together.
Modern software companies often apply Theory Y by trusting employees with flexible working conditions.
Quick Revision Summary
Scientific Management (Taylor): Focuses on shop-floor efficiency.
Administrative Theory (Fayol): Focuses on management functions and principles.
Bureaucracy (Weber): Focuses on formal structure and rules.
Human Relations (Mayo): Focuses on social needs of workers.
Systems Approach: Organization as interconnected parts.
Contingency Approach: No single best way to manage.
Theory X vs Y: Different assumptions managers make about workers.